CorporateNegative · Do not buyProPakistani

Pakistan’s EV Tax Incentives May Cost Treasury Rs 150 billion Annually

Experts warn that generous tax breaks for new‑energy vehicles could forfeit about Rs 150 billion each year, raising concerns over fiscal pressure despite potential gains for the auto industry.

Full article on ProPakistani

Share

Pakistan’s EV Tax Incentives May Cost Treasury Rs 150 billion Annually — Automobile, Economy, Markets | Shariah PSX

Desk Analysis

How This Affects the Exchange

Sector Effect

Negative · Do not buy

Large fiscal loss from EV tax breaks outweighs modest auto sector gains, so overall PSX risk is negative – avoid buying broadly.

Sectors & Direction

Desk read

Desk call: Do not buy · Negatively affected

  • AutomobileNegatively affected
  • EconomyNegatively affected
  • MarketsNegatively affected

Companies

HUBC · Do not buyKEL · Do not buyKAPCO · Do not buyINDU · Do not buyHCAR · Do not buyMTL · Do not buy

Companies Mentioned

  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy
  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy
  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy
  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy
  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy
  • · Negatively affected · Do not buy

Mentions in This Briefing

Sectors: Automobile, Economy, Markets Negative · Do not buy. PSX tickers: HUBC, KEL, KAPCO, INDU, HCAR, MTL. Large fiscal loss from EV tax breaks outweighs modest auto sector gains, so overall PSX risk is negative – avoid buying broadly.

Full Story

Open on ProPakistani

## Government’s EV Tax Concessions

The federal government has introduced a flat 1 percent sales tax regime and other duty waivers for New Energy Vehicles (NEVs). Abdul Rehman, former chairperson of the Pakistan Association of Automotive Parts and Accessories Manufacturers, estimates that if annual NEV sales reach 50,000 units, the average concession of roughly Rs 3 million per vehicle would translate into a revenue loss of around Rs 150 billion per year.

## Scale of the Fiscal Impact

Rehman highlighted that the projected concession exceeds the Higher Education Commission’s FY 2025‑26 allocation of about Rs 35 billion by more than four times, underscoring the magnitude of the fiscal burden.

## Arguments for and Against the Incentives

While acknowledging that electric mobility can curb fuel imports, lower emissions, and nurture a domestic EV industry, Rehman questioned whether the current incentive design delivers the widest economic and social benefits. He suggested redirecting support toward electric buses, motorcycles, rickshaws, charging infrastructure, and local battery‑component production to broaden the impact beyond affluent private‑car buyers.

## Recommendations for Policy Design

Rehman urged the government to attach clear localisation, investment, and employment requirements to any EV incentives. He argued that without such conditions, the large fiscal outlay may not yield proportional industrial development or job creation.

## Market Implications

The automotive sector could see a modest uptick in demand for NEVs, but the broader market may feel pressure from the sizeable revenue shortfall, potentially affecting investor sentiment toward fiscal‑sensitive stocks.